Sports

/

ArcaMax

Dennis Anderson: Are insecticides toxic to pheasants and the places they live? Minnesota DNR hopes to find out.

Dennis Anderson, Star Tribune on

Published in Outdoors

MINNEAPOLIS — When the Minnesota pheasant season opened Saturday, some hunters were tested not only for their skills afield, but for their generosity.

If they were fortunate enough to bag a rooster or two, in some parts of the state’s pheasant range they were asked to forfeit their hard-earned bounty.

The sacrifices are for a good cause. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is attempting to determine whether a group of insecticides known as neonicotinoids are hurting pheasants and the places they live.

To study the possible effects of the chemicals on pheasants, DNR researchers were on site at a handful of state wildlife management areas last weekend asking successful hunters to contribute a total of five roosters at each location.

Now in its second year, the study is headed by upland game bird researcher Steven Woodley out of the DNR’s Madelia office.

Woodley discusses the study in the interview that follows. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Q: What are “neonics?’’

A: Neonics is short for neonicotinoids, which refer to a class of insecticides applied primarily as coatings to soybean and corn seeds, among other seeds. They’re widely used by farmers in Minnesota and throughout the U.S. A primary concern of research done so far on neonics has been their effect on bees and other pollinators.

Q: How do neonics work?

A: Generally, they bind and disrupt insects’ brain receptors, causing them to over-stimulate and ultimately die if they consume a plant growing from a coated seed. Mammals and birds don’t have the same receptors. But there’s mounting evidence that birds are affected by neonics, possibly affecting migrators, but also possibly affecting non-migrators such as pheasants.

Q: Has any completed research shown negative effects of neonics on pheasants?

A: A thesis out of South Dakota State University that was unpublished tested captive pheasants that were fed neonic-treated corn seeds. The study estimated about 77 ingested coated seeds a day would be lethal to pheasants. The study also showed that some pheasants that ingested just 15 seeds a day demonstrated occasional lethargy.

Q: Do pheasants typically eat as many as 77 seeds a day?

A: In our study we’ve found wild pheasants with more than 100 agricultural seeds in their crops.

Q: When are pheasants most exposed to treated seeds?

A: During spring planting. But also around silos and so forth, where seeds are spilled.

Q: Are songbirds similarly exposed, and do they typically consume these seeds?

A: Yes, songbirds that primarily consume seeds are similarly exposed.

 

Q: Is all of the insecticide taken up by the target plant, or does some end up in the soil and, possibly, nearby water?

A: Only about 5% of the chemical is taken up by the target plant. Much of the rest gets into the soil.

Q: Do treated seeds taste different to birds than untreated seeds?

A: In the South Dakota State University study, given a choice between treated and untreated seeds, pheasants preferred untreated seeds.

Q: Are neonics banned in Europe?

A: Generally, yes. And some states in the U.S. restrict their use.

Q: Are there alternative insecticides that don’t have the potential risks that neonics do?

A: I don’t have a good answer for that. Certainly there’s potential for worse insecticides.

Q: Who is funding the DNR’s study?

A: The Legislature made the appropriation. A primary concern was the possible ingestion of neonic-coated seeds by pheasants. But neonics can last in soil for a long time, and being water soluble it’s possible they can leach into state Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) that adjoin corn or soybean fields. So our three-year study — we’re in year two — is intended to check out not only the possible effects of neonics on pheasants, but their habitats.

Q: How is the study designed?

A: We’ve chosen six different WMAs each year, three larger and three smaller. Each adjoins soybean or corn fields. The intent is to see whether the larger complexes offer more protection to soil and wildlife from possible contamination than smaller complexes. Each year, before and after seeding, and also in July and October, we are collecting forbs, arthropods and soil from the margins and interior areas of these WMAs to check for possible contamination.

Q: You’re also testing pheasants directly, right?

A: Yes. In spring, prior to planting, by permit we’re collecting up to five roosters from each WMA. After dissecting them we send a breast, liver and crop contents from each bird to a federal lab.

Q: Any results yet?

A: Findings are only preliminary, not enough to talk about. I will share one positive result we’ve had, however. Of the 23 pheasants we’ve collected, we’ve also tested them for avian bird flu, and they’ve all come back negative.


©2025 The Minnesota Star Tribune. Visit startribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Comics

Michael de Adder Andy Marlette Luann Diamond Lil Brilliant Mind of Edison Lee Agnes